How can we assist you? Book an appointment with us today!

Understanding Michigan's New Marijuana Tax Challenge

Michigan finds itself embroiled in a significant cannabis policy dispute, driven by a bold 24% wholesale marijuana tax recently introduced and now contested on constitutional grounds. As judicial proceedings commence, the case commands national focus, both for its potential to impact cannabis pricing and for its larger implications on voter-approved legislation and tax policy countrywide.

Whether you're a cannabis consumer or live hundreds of miles from Michigan, this verdict holds significance. It could shape the framework for how states sculpt, revise, and justify cannabis taxes—setting a precedent for possible future legal conflicts as the industry evolves.

Here's what you need to be aware of.

What Is Michigan Proposing?

As part of its 2025–2026 fiscal plan, Michigan legislators passed a 24% wholesale tax on cannabis, crafted to fund road infrastructure projects. This tax targets transactions earlier in the supply chain, well before products are available to consumers at dispensaries.

Image 2

Currently, Michigan imposes additional taxes:

  • A 10% excise tax on retail cannabis sales, approved by voters in 2018

  • A 6% state sales tax

Should the new wholesale tax be implemented, Michigan could boast one of the highest stacked cannabis tax structures in the nation.

Why Have Industry Leaders Filed a Lawsuit?

The Michigan Cannabis Industry Association (MCIA) contests the tax as unconstitutional. Their primary contention is:

The 2018 voter-endorsed marijuana statute mandates a three-fourths supermajority for any amendments, a protection established under the Michigan Regulation and Taxation of Marihuana Act (MRTMA). Legislators pushed the wholesale tax through with mere simple majority approval.

Image 3

MCIA spokesperson Rose Tantraphol articulated the broader stakes, as reported by Michigan Advance:

“Our presence in court underscores our commitment to safeguarding the decisions of Michigan voters.” (Source: Michigan Advance)

Industry representatives caution that the tax would heighten operational costs, strain smaller businesses, and potentially drive consumers toward unregulated markets—a pattern currently visible in high-tax states like California.

What’s the State's Position?

Michigan officials assert the tax’s legitimacy:

  • The wholesale tax introduces a new charge, distinct from modifications to the 2018 initiative

  • The legislature possesses the prerogative to levy taxes to address fiscal needs

  • Its objective is to bolster transport infrastructure, not transform cannabis policy

If judicial bodies agree, the tax might commence on January 1, 2026.

Potential Consumer Impact

Americans beyond Michigan's borders should recognize that cannabis tax regimes often echo across state lines. Should this tax withstand challenges:

  • Wholesale costs are likely to climb

  • Retail prices may surge to offset the increase

  • Consumers could turn toward more affordable illicit products

  • Small enterprises might face consolidation pressures

If overturned, Michigan's preexisting tax structure—one of the more economically feasible models nationally—remains untouched.

Why This Lawsuit Resonates Nationally

Though this legal battle unfolds in Michigan, it holds wider relevance.

1. It examines the bounds of voter-initiated laws

If lawmakers can instituted taxes sans supermajority backing, it could redefine ballot initiatives’ dynamics across states employing them.

2. It could sway other jurisdictions' cannabis tax strategies

States grappling with insufficient infrastructure funding may emulate Michigan's approach if successful.

3. It underscores a national issue: cannabis tax diversity

States such as Oregon and Michigan levy more manageable taxes, enhancing legal competitiveness, whereas high-tax states like California foster robust illicit economies.

Michigan's legal proceedings could set the standard for tax-related lawsuits in other states.

Next Steps

A Michigan Court of Claims judge has heard the preliminary arguments and a decision is awaited. The case is poised for escalation to the Michigan Supreme Court.

Whatever the judgment, it will hold monumental consequences—not only for Michigan’s cannabis industry but also regarding state-level legislative autonomy over voter-endorsed statutes, nascent sectors, and taxing rights.

Share this article...

Want tax & accounting tips and insights?

Sign up for our newsletter.

I confirm this is a service inquiry and not an advertising message or solicitation. By clicking “Submit”, I acknowledge and agree to the creation of an account and to the and .

Affiliations